Managing Rising Damp
Where Subfloor Ventilation Falls Short

NCC 2019 Volume Two
Area of NCC Requirements:
- Section 3.4.1.2 – Subfloor Ventilation
- P2.2.3 – Rising Damp
The Challenge
Effective subfloor ventilation is a critical element of residential construction, particularly for managing moisture and preventing rising damp. In this project, the proposed dwelling did not meet the NCC’s Deemed-to-Satisfy (DTS) provisions for natural subfloor ventilation.
Limitations in subfloor clearance and the location of ventilation openings meant that adequate natural crossflow could not be achieved. Without intervention, this created a heightened risk of moisture accumulation beneath the floor, increasing the likelihood of timber decay, fungal growth, and conditions favourable to termite activity.
Because the DTS pathway could not be satisfied, a performance-based approach was required to demonstrate that the dwelling could still achieve the NCC’s intent for moisture control and durability.
What This Really Means
The NCC’s subfloor ventilation requirements are not about how air is moved—they are about outcomes. The objective is to ensure that moisture does not accumulate beneath the building in a way that compromises structural elements or occupant health.
Where natural ventilation cannot be reliably achieved, the NCC allows alternative methods, provided they can be shown to manage moisture at least as effectively as the DTS solution.
The Solution
A performance-based assessment was undertaken to demonstrate that the proposed subfloor environment could be maintained in a dry and stable condition, despite departing from DTS ventilation provisions.
The assessment considered:
- How airflow is introduced and maintained within the subfloor space
- Whether moisture levels are effectively controlled under normal conditions
- The reliability of the ventilation approach over the life of the building
- How the proposed system compares to the moisture-management intent of DTS provisions
- Long-term durability of subfloor timbers and materials
Rather than relying solely on passive openings, the assessment focused on whether the subfloor performs as intended—remaining dry, ventilated, and resistant to damp-related deterioration.
Why This Matters
The final report confirmed that the proposed design satisfied Performance Requirement P2.2.3 for rising damp. By demonstrating that moisture is effectively controlled through an alternative ventilation strategy, the dwelling was shown to achieve outcomes equivalent to those intended by the NCC’s DTS provisions.
This project highlights how performance solutions provide a clear pathway where site constraints limit conventional approaches—ensuring compliance without unnecessary redesign or compromise to building durability.
Ventilation compliance sub-par?
Reach out to our team for the solution.